Blockchain Platforms Overview
Core principles, consensus mechanisms, and key innovations of major blockchain platforms.
Bitcoin (BTC)
Core Principles
- Digital gold: Store of value, not programmable
- Decentralization: ~15,000 full nodes worldwide
- Security: Most secure blockchain (highest hash rate)
- Simplicity: Intentionally limited functionality
Consensus
- Proof of Work (PoW): SHA-256 mining
- Block time: ~10 minutes
- Block size: 1-4 MB (with SegWit)
- Finality: Probabilistic (~6 confirmations)
Key Innovations
- UTXO model: Unspent Transaction Outputs
- Script: Stack-based, non-Turing complete
- Lightning Network: Layer 2 for instant payments
- Taproot: Privacy + smart contract improvements
Use Cases
- Store of value
- Censorship-resistant payments
- Final settlement layer
Ethereum (ETH)
Core Principles
- World computer: Decentralized computation platform
- Smart contracts: Turing-complete programs
- EVM: Ethereum Virtual Machine
- Account model: Not UTXO
Consensus
- Proof of Stake (PoS): Since "The Merge" (2022)
- Block time: ~12 seconds
- Finality: ~15 minutes (2 epochs)
- Validators: 32 ETH stake required
Key Innovations
- Smart contracts: Solidity language
- ERC standards: ERC-20 (tokens), ERC-721 (NFTs)
- Layer 2: Rollups (Optimistic, ZK)
- Sharding: Future scalability (Danksharding)
Architecture
Use Cases
- DeFi (Decentralized Finance)
- NFTs and digital assets
- DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations)
- General-purpose smart contracts
Cosmos (ATOM)
Core Principles
- Internet of Blockchains: Interconnected chains
- Sovereignty: Each chain controls own governance
- Interoperability: IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication)
- Modularity: Cosmos SDK for custom chains
Consensus
- Tendermint BFT: Byzantine Fault Tolerant
- Block time: ~6 seconds
- Finality: Instant (single block)
- Validators: Delegated Proof of Stake
Key Innovations
- IBC Protocol: Cross-chain communication
- Cosmos SDK: Framework for building blockchains
- Hub-and-Zone model: Cosmos Hub connects zones
- Shared security: Interchain Security
Architecture
Use Cases
- Application-specific blockchains
- Cross-chain DeFi
- Sovereign chains with interoperability
Polkadot (DOT)
Core Principles
- Shared security: All parachains secured by relay chain
- Heterogeneous sharding: Different chains, different purposes
- Cross-chain messaging: XCM (Cross-Consensus Message)
- Governance: On-chain, forkless upgrades
Consensus
- GRANDPA + BABE: Finality + block production
- Block time: ~6 seconds
- Finality: 1-2 blocks (~12 seconds)
- Validators: Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS)
Key Innovations
- Relay Chain: Central security hub
- Parachains: Parallel chains with shared security
- Parathreads: Pay-per-block parachains
- Substrate: Framework for building blockchains
Architecture
Use Cases
- Specialized blockchains with shared security
- Cross-chain applications
- Scalable multi-chain ecosystems
Solana (SOL)
Core Principles
- High performance: 65,000+ TPS theoretical
- Low cost: Fractions of a cent per transaction
- Proof of History: Novel time-keeping mechanism
- Single global state: No sharding
Consensus
- Proof of History + PoS: Hybrid approach
- Block time: ~400ms
- Finality: ~13 seconds
- Validators: Permissionless PoS
Key Innovations
- Proof of History (PoH): Verifiable delay function for time
- Sealevel: Parallel smart contract runtime
- Gulf Stream: Mempool-less transaction forwarding
- Turbine: Block propagation protocol
Architecture
Use Cases
- High-frequency trading
- Gaming and NFTs
- Real-time applications
- DeFi with low fees
Cardano (ADA)
Core Principles
- Research-driven: Peer-reviewed academic approach
- Formal methods: Mathematical verification
- Layered architecture: Settlement + Computation
- Sustainability: Treasury system for funding
Consensus
- Ouroboros PoS: Provably secure
- Block time: ~20 seconds
- Finality: Probabilistic (~15 blocks)
- Stake pools: Delegated staking
Key Innovations
- EUTXO model: Extended UTXO with smart contracts
- Plutus: Haskell-based smart contracts
- Hydra: Layer 2 state channels
- Catalyst: Decentralized governance
Architecture
Use Cases
- Identity and credentials
- Supply chain tracking
- DeFi with formal verification
- Developing nations (financial inclusion)
Comparison Table
| Platform | Consensus | TPS | Finality | Smart Contracts | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | PoW | 7 | ~60 min | Limited | Security, Store of Value |
| Ethereum | PoS | 15-30 | ~15 min | Yes (EVM) | Largest ecosystem |
| Cosmos | Tendermint BFT | 1000+ | Instant | Yes (CosmWasm) | Interoperability |
| Polkadot | GRANDPA+BABE | 1000+ | ~12 sec | Yes (Wasm) | Shared security |
| Solana | PoH+PoS | 3000+ | ~13 sec | Yes (Rust) | High performance |
| Cardano | Ouroboros PoS | 250 | ~5 min | Yes (Plutus) | Formal methods |
Common Concepts
Consensus Mechanisms
- PoW: Energy-intensive, secure, slow
- PoS: Energy-efficient, faster, economic security
- BFT: Instant finality, requires known validators
- PoH: Novel time-keeping for ordering
Scalability Approaches
- Layer 2: Lightning, Rollups, State Channels
- Sharding: Divide network into parallel chains
- Sidechains: Separate chains with bridges
- Parachains: Shared security model
Finality Types
- Probabilistic: Becomes more certain over time (Bitcoin)
- Instant: Single block confirmation (Tendermint)
- Economic: Slashing for misbehavior (PoS)
Notes
- Blockchain trilemma: Decentralization, Security, Scalability - pick 2
- Layer 1 vs Layer 2: Base chain vs scaling solution
- EVM compatibility: Many chains support Ethereum contracts
- Interoperability: Growing focus on cross-chain communication
Gotchas/Warnings
- ⚠️ Finality: Understand probabilistic vs instant finality
- ⚠️ MEV: Miner/Validator Extractable Value is an issue
- ⚠️ Bridge risks: Cross-chain bridges are attack vectors
- ⚠️ Centralization: Many "decentralized" chains have few validators
comments powered by Disqus