<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://itohi.com/feed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Vibration on ITOHI — Open-Source Hardware, Embedded Systems &amp; DIY Builds</title><link>https://itohi.com/tags/vibration/</link><description>Recent content in Vibration on ITOHI — Open-Source Hardware, Embedded Systems &amp; DIY Builds</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>2022 @ ITOHI - All rights reserved</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://itohi.com/tags/vibration/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>From Meteor75 Pro to Meteor75 Pro II: a week of fighting resonances</title><link>https://itohi.com/fpv/meteor75-pro-ii-fighting-resonances/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://itohi.com/fpv/meteor75-pro-ii-fighting-resonances/</guid><description>
&lt;!--
DRAFT NOTES FOR ANDRIUS — delete this comment block before publishing.
1. TITLE / DATE — still yours to confirm. series is [FPV Builds] to match the
other FPV posts, thumbnail is meteor75-pro-vs-pro-ii.jpg. Both language
files match on series and thumbnail.
2. LITHUANIAN TERMINOLOGY — needs your review. Five coinages I could not
validate, all in index.lt.md:
- "vibracijos gaubtinė" (vibration envelope)
- "struktūrinė moda" (structural mode)
- "atsako dozė" (dose-response)
- "prisukta masė" (sprung mass)
- "struktūrai fiksuota ypatybė" (structure-fixed feature)
Betaflight parameter names and metric labels are deliberately left in
English throughout — intentional, not an oversight.
3. NUMBERS STATED TWO WAYS — RESOLVED. Rather than silently picking one value,
the opening of "Method notes worth keeping" now names the two analysis
windows and explains every apparent disagreement:
- 34.8/24.6 vs 34.5/24.5, +66% vs +65%, 0.789% vs 0.812%, 0.04% vs 0.076%
-&gt; different impact-exclusion pad or a different log, not a correction
- foam post-filter roll 0.50 vs 0.67 deg/s -&gt; two different metrics
(Welch above 60 Hz vs an 80-780 Hz bandpass RMS)
- the two five-mount sets (37.7/26.2/33.0/30.1/41.0 and
38.3/26.0/31.0/26.6/42.5) -&gt; outdoor RPM-binned vs steady-flight
throttle-banded windows
The intro now says "seven of them, itemised later" and matches the seven H3s
under "Everything I got wrong". The stray "wrong for the fifth time" is gone.
4. chart8 in snake-chart-data.json (outside this folder) had a stale
"Peak 48.8 -&gt; 28.0 deg/s (-43%)" annotation. Already corrected there; the
retired figure survives only in a _retracted metadata field as an audit
trail, so regenerating from the JSON will not reintroduce it.
5. EXIF — GPS IFD removed from all five photos, remaining tags kept per the
GPS-only rule. Verified before committing.
6. TONE — all four photographs were rebuilt from the originals with anchored
monotone L-channel curves, not brightness multiplication. Every one passes
the verification gate. The screenshot is deliberately uncurved.
--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Craft name &lt;strong&gt;Snake&lt;/strong&gt;. It started life as a Meteor75 Pro, and it is now a Meteor75 Pro II —
frame and canopy ordered off AliExpress, everything expensive carried straight over. Same
&lt;strong&gt;Matrix 1S 3-in-1 FC&lt;/strong&gt;. Same &lt;strong&gt;narrow-FOV DJI O4&lt;/strong&gt; air unit. New shell, old guts, and by the
time I was done, 169 flights and 15,574 seconds of logs to argue with.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>